We've all known for some time that George enjoys a bargain. If something is free of charge, or paid for by someone else, he's your man. He's never happier than when a necessary task or function is carried out for free by a volunteer, which is curious given how many of them he has lost during his tenure.
The more business-minded of us would applaud his attempts to maximise income at Latimer Park. The only way we get bigger and better as a club is to increase revenue. Even his biggest detractors would admit the fanzone and the matchday hospitality experience have greatly improved in the past couple of years. George must be doing something right. Two good seasons on the pitch and 1000+ crowds speak of a club on the up. The more you can get FOC, the more money is available to invest into the club and the team - which is what we all want.
And yet....
From very early in the Akhtar reign questions were being asked. So many volunteers were stepping down and raising questions about George's methods and attitude. The Club social media output vacillates between impressive and imbecilic - when it works at all, as the current playing staff page on the website will readily attest. Despite hosting a number of fan events and inviting anyone and everyone to ask any questions they liked of him, his often terse reactions suggested there were certain questions that weren't entirely welcome. We found this out for ourselves when asking about the imposition of car-parking fees on a carpark he didn't own, only for George's nice-guy persona to drop for a moment.
And yet, until yesterday, no-one could point at anything that George had actually, unequivocally, done wrong. That changed when Clark Cowell - Chair of the Poppies Community Trust accused George, via KTFC Chat of basically fraudulent activity with regard to securing funding for the new floodlights. Assuming the events have played out exactly as Clark has described, if is difficult to see how George will be able to justify his actions, or survive them.
If it proves to be a fact that George did indeed sign the funding application on behalf of the trustees of the Community Trust, you've got to ask - why? All he needed to do was to invite one of the trustees to complete the funding application, so why do it himself? Don't know. Perhaps he assumed as Club Chairman he was sufficiently highly placed to complete the application. Or did he perhaps think no-one would think of questioning him doing it? Either way, it will take more than an AI-augmented social media reply to justify what to our totally-untrained legal-eye looks an awful lot like fraud.
![]() |
| We'll wager that THAT night at Sixfields feels an awfully L-O-N-G time ago now.... |





